Discussion:
I'm surprised the Christians haven't advanced this theory about the dinosaurs
(too old to reply)
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
2013-09-15 18:46:22 UTC
Permalink
It's very simple: They couldn't fit in the Ark and they drowned.

Now all those kids fascinated with the dinosaurs, who couldn't square their existence with the Bible, finally have something to calm their curious mind. No more questions like "Did Adam & Eve ever have a dinosaur pet?" You know, kids ask those kind of questions. Kids tend to ask "why" this and "why" the other and it makes people uncomfortable. You know, I heard that the difference between humans and monkeys is that the monkeys never ask "why." So kids trying to grow human ask "why" until we tell them to shut up.

Hey, you finally have an explanation.


----------------------------------------------------------

http://BANANAREVOLUTION.webspawner.com
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
2013-09-16 18:31:30 UTC
Permalink
Dragons in History
http://www.genesispark.com/exhibits/evidence/historical/dragons/
The atheistic astronomer Carl Sagan once remarked: “The pervasiveness of dragon myths in the folk legends of many cultures is probably no accident” (Sagan, Carl, The Dragons of Eden, New York: Random House, 1977, p. 149). Indeed he felt compelled to address the similarity to the great reptiles of the Jurassic era and “explain them away.” How could Sagan do this? Peter Dickinson stated, “Carl Sagan tried to account for the spread and consistency of dragon legends by saying that they are fossil memories of the time of the dinosaurs, come down to us through a general mammalian memory inherited from the early mammals, our ancestors, who had to compete with the great predatory lizards.” (Dickinson, Peter, The Flight of Dragons, New York: Harper and Row, 1979, p. 127). Thus Carl Sagan believed that we evolved not merely our physical bodies, but also memories “uploaded” from our mammalian ancestors!
I don't think our ancestors had to compete with gigantic lizards. Unless you take this seriously...



Now imagine a very smart kid and a very dumb mother having this conversation: "Mom, weren't the animals in the ark eating each other?" "Well, you little monkey," said his mother, "you better shut up or God will punish you."

I don't know how a creative kid can grow in a Christian family. He would go with questions like these:

"Why can't I ride a bike in my community?"

"Aren't we supposed to be saving the planet?"

"Why are you so dumb to drive everywhere and not share a bike ride with me?"

"If I grow a belly like you, will I be dumb?"

Kids are terrific today. They even have access to the Internet, so they there's some hope they realize this world is run by the dumb and dumber.

***

May I suggest that you see Caveman one more time? I think it's OK for the kids too.
His Highness the Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
2013-09-17 03:13:42 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:26:42 -0700 (PDT), "His Highness the Wise
Yeah, but then there's the issue of the animals eating each other, right? That represents
a logistic nightmare similar to a floating zoo. Have you ever seen a floating zoo?
I'm sure Yaweh took care of that ... put 'em all on
diet pills or something :-)
Oh, and induced severe constipation ...
Dunno what was done about the animals in Australia
and the Americas ..... certainly couldn't walk to Iraq
to catch the boat.
The whole "ark" story is SO riddled with logical and
logistical holes that you'd think only the termites
were saved. Yet the faithful still *believe* ... even
wander around the hills looking for bits of this boat.
Show what too much "belief" will do to the old IQ.
And finally, a global FLOOD ??? Yaweh the all-powerful
coulda simply *wished* everything dead on the spot
instead of finding more water than exists on the earth
to drown everything.
Of course there WERE great floods - likely wiped out
rather large areas too. Came about 12,000 years ago
when the glaciers melted. Great torrents dozens of
miles wide washing down, and the sea came up nearly
300 feet in just 1000 years or so. That kind of stuff
would make a definite IMPRESSION ... stories that
would last 12,000 years in various forms.
To the locals, who probably were born and died
within 20 miles of the same place at the time,
these floods really WOULD have seemed to
encompass the whole world. Add the "fish story"
embellishments for few thousand years and
you get .... well ... "arks" and stuff.
There was just enough civilization 12,000 years ago
to keep these tales alive. The end of the preceeding
ice age was about 135,000 years ago ; and while
there were modern-type people back then too they
were small nomadic groups. Any flood tales would
have mutated and dissipated in the 120,000 years
that followed. No 'civilization', no writing, no sense
of history. So far, there are no sure signs of
interglacial human civilizations or advanced
neanderthal civilizations at all ...
Kinda sad really, that's nearly 200,000 years of
human history that never got recorded. What
WERE they doing for all that time ? Wandering
around randomly and trying to fornicate faster
than the large beasties could eat them ? The
genetic record suggests a lot of wandering,
lots of almost-human groups blending into the
more uniform product of today.
You may imagine a boat 20 stories high, carefully packed so it wouldn't tip, the food that went with it, the water needed to flood everything, but nothing compares to the fact that the animals would try to eat each other. Perhaps they did. Perhaps 90% of the species was lost.

Here's another Christian nightmare they can explain away through the ark. Since it's documented by the archaeological record that so many species came before us, they can say they were eaten by other animals or drowned where appropriate. Of course, fish don't drown, but they are rather eaten by bigger fish.

Imagine an alligator in close quarters with the sheep. He would eat one, and the whole species would be lost. Luckily for them, the sheep survived.
Loading...