Mice prove the existence of God?

[Free Spirit, Chief of Quixotic Enterprises]

1- OVERPOPULATION (thank religion for that)

there is no real overpopulation. this is just propaganda to sterilize people against their well and through stealth.

2- CLIMATE CHANGE (count on religion ignoring the issue)

used to be "global warming." changed to climate change because that's the new propaganda. gotta get more carbon taxes.

3- PANDEMICS (thank modern mobility for that)

gotta have those bioweapons to get rid of people for 1.

4- NUCLEAR/BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS (thank technology and predatory wars/terrorism)
I wouldn't panic about it but we must be aware of what's going on in the jungle. Perhaps it's time to have some shot of whiskey. The sinking of the Titanic is a great metaphor for the world. At no time people stopped dancing and drinking. However the iceberg was still out there.

gotta get rid of people for 1. the same people who want to lower population are the same people in charge of nukes and biological weapons. if you're worried about these why not go after the people in charge who believe in 1.

You prove my point so well. Actually you've got everything upside down.

Let me use mice for illustration:

You can only accommodate so many mice in a box (the "habitat"). Our habitat is getting crowded and the fight for resources is getting more desperate.

Now, how can you distrust the scientists who overwhelmingly believe in climate change? Why don't you distrust the science behind the doctors? Do you know mice are behind all those medical advances?

Thank mice for being alive. Yes, monkeys too. They are dying so you can live.


--------------------------------------------------------------

"The jungle has never been this much fun!"

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nffbCR_uCZ6znjf3gLiFRXSAoLzhWtoZ6U4S7Y37aKc/edit?usp=sharing

[Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher]

On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 09:15:09 -0700, Free Spirit, Chief of Quixotic

Post by Free Spirit, Chief of Quixotic Enterprises
You can only accommodate so many mice in a box (the "habitat"). Our
habitat is getting crowded and the fight for resources is getting more
desperate.
Now, how can you distrust the scientists who overwhelmingly believe in
climate change? Why don't you distrust the science behind the doctors?
Do you know mice are behind all those medical advances?
Thank mice for being alive. Yes, monkeys too. They are dying so you can live.

Mice also commissioned the earth as a huge computer, to determine the
answer to 'Life, the universe and everything'. The answer was 42.

God was not a good designer. Actually any scientist would have done things better: He would have created the mice FIRST, then experiment with them BEFORE creating humans.

If you were to believe in creation, ours would have been a pretty stupid creation. We were created by reckless design, giving us too much responsibility. At times we are not smarter than a monkey.

God was a failure, but that's only my humble opinion.

[High Miles]

Post by Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher

On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 09:15:09 -0700, Free Spirit, Chief of Quixotic

Post by Free Spirit, Chief of Quixotic Enterprises
You can only accommodate so many mice in a box (the "habitat"). Our
habitat is getting crowded and the fight for resources is getting more
desperate.
Now, how can you distrust the scientists who overwhelmingly believe in
climate change? Why don't you distrust the science behind the doctors?
Do you know mice are behind all those medical advances?
Thank mice for being alive. Yes, monkeys too. They are dying so you can live.

Mice also commissioned the earth as a huge computer, to determine the
answer to 'Life, the universe and everything'. The answer was 42.

God was not a good designer. Actually any scientist would have done things better: He would have created the mice FIRST, then experiment with them BEFORE creating humans.
If you were to believe in creation, ours would have been a pretty stupid creation. We were created by reckless design, giving us too much responsibility. At times we are not smarter than a monkey.
God was a failure, but that's only my humble opinion.

Nothing was bound to be a bad engineer.
Something must exist to be a reliable creator.

[Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher]

Post by High Miles

Post by Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher

On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 09:15:09 -0700, Free Spirit, Chief of Quixotic

Post by Free Spirit, Chief of Quixotic Enterprises
You can only accommodate so many mice in a box (the "habitat"). Our
habitat is getting crowded and the fight for resources is getting more
desperate.
Now, how can you distrust the scientists who overwhelmingly believe in
climate change? Why don't you distrust the science behind the doctors?
Do you know mice are behind all those medical advances?
Thank mice for being alive. Yes, monkeys too. They are dying so you can live.

Mice also commissioned the earth as a huge computer, to determine the
answer to 'Life, the universe and everything'. The answer was 42.

God was not a good designer. Actually any scientist would have done things better: He would have created the mice FIRST, then experiment with them BEFORE creating humans.
If you were to believe in creation, ours would have been a pretty stupid creation. We were created by reckless design, giving us too much responsibility. At times we are not smarter than a monkey.
God was a failure, but that's only my humble opinion.

Nothing was bound to be a bad engineer.
Something must exist to be a reliable creator.

The question is why he created mice, to spread disease or to experiment cures for humans?

There's a lot of psychological studies on mice as well. In some ways they are smarter than us.

[High Miles]

Post by Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher

Post by High Miles

Post by Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher

On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 09:15:09 -0700, Free Spirit, Chief of Quixotic

Post by Free Spirit, Chief of Quixotic Enterprises
You can only accommodate so many mice in a box (the "habitat"). Our
habitat is getting crowded and the fight for resources is getting more
desperate.
Now, how can you distrust the scientists who overwhelmingly believe in
climate change? Why don't you distrust the science behind the doctors?
Do you know mice are behind all those medical advances?
Thank mice for being alive. Yes, monkeys too. They are dying so you can live.

Mice also commissioned the earth as a huge computer, to determine the
answer to 'Life, the universe and everything'. The answer was 42.

God was not a good designer. Actually any scientist would have done things better: He would have created the mice FIRST, then experiment with them BEFORE creating humans.
If you were to believe in creation, ours would have been a pretty stupid creation. We were created by reckless design, giving us too much responsibility. At times we are not smarter than a monkey.
God was a failure, but that's only my humble opinion.

Nothing was bound to be a bad engineer.
Something must exist to be a reliable creator.

The question is why he created mice, to spread disease or to experiment cures for humans?
There's a lot of psychological studies on mice as well. In some ways they are smarter than us.

Exactly
They don't worship imaginary gods. ;-)