Discussion:
Neither milk nor the Bible are good for you
(too old to reply)
Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
2014-11-01 16:13:46 UTC
Permalink
Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
"While our work requires us to be mentally agile, most of us lead a
physically inactive lifestyle that can lead to a number of health problems.
Recent studies have shown that a sedentary lifestyle can be more potentially
dangerous to our health than smoking. In a study recently carried out at the
University of Hong Kong, researchers found that 20% of deaths in people over
the age of 35 could be directly attributed to physical inactivity. That is
a higher percentage than death caused through smoking."
http://ethansjames.blogspot.com/2012/02/tips-for-avoiding-sedentary-lifestyl
e.html
"Studies" are a load of garbage. They only ever "prove" what the person
paying for it wants it to prove by using manipulated statistics, low
number of subjects, inaccurate and dubious tests, ignoring whatever
doesn't "fit", and misleadingly reporting the "findings".
Plus, another study always comes along to later "prove" the one before
it was wrong ... and the whole stupidity often keeps bouncing backwards
and forwards. One minute drinking wine id bad for you, then it's good
for you, then it's bad for you again, then ... believing in all these
crap studies is almost as idiotic as the fairytale nonsense the
religious nutters believe. :-\
And to prove that point about the sheer idiocy (as well as money and
time wasted) of silly "studies": there is an article in today's local
newspaper about another idiotic "study" that "proves" drinking milk, or
at least more than three glasses a day, is bad for you ... previously
of course the "experts" kept telling you that you should drink more
milk, and here in New Zealand they had started on resurrecting the old
system of free milk in schools for kids to drink. :-\
I've read that one. I had learned recently that whole milk may have been better for you than skim milk (which tastes like shit) and I was enjoying the creamy taste. Now I don't know what to do.
What would Jesus do? ;)
OK, OK, they can keep the milk, but they can not take my bipedal condition away. Milk was never assimilated because it wasn't part of the evolutionary process. Milk came with sedentary life along with the Bible.

Neither milk nor the Bible are good for you.


-------------------------------------------------

"The jungle has never been this much fun!"

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nffbCR_uCZ6znjf3gLiFRXSAoLzhWtoZ6U4S7Y37aKc/edit?usp=sharing
Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
2014-11-01 17:04:39 UTC
Permalink
Post by Wise TibetanMonkey, Most Humble Philosopher
OK, OK, they can keep the milk, but they can not take my bipedal condition away. Milk was never assimilated because it wasn't part of the evolutionary process. Milk came with sedentary life along with the Bible.
Neither milk nor the Bible are good for you.
-------------------------------------------------
"The jungle has never been this much fun!"
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nffbCR_uCZ6znjf3gLiFRXSAoLzhWtoZ6U4S7Y37aKc/edit?usp=sharing
A lot of people swear to consuming raw milk. After it's homogenized the body can't digest it very well. There's truth in that. Milk contains casein, a material that is used in making jet fighter wind shields.
Yes, homogenization could be an issue but it's complicated --just like the Bible.
http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/health-fitness/healthy-eating/is-homogenized-milk-bad-for-you
Yes, the Bible has been homogenized too...

"Our Bible translations are also intensely homogenized. This homogenization furthers the illusion that the Bible has one author -- the Holy Spirit. This illusion is the result of all the highly varied texts of the Bible being translated by the same committee (or person, sometimes) working under a specific set of theological and translation guidelines."

http://triangulations.wordpress.com/2009/12/12/homogenized-bible/

***

Nobody, but nobody, is absorbing the raw Bible.

Loading...